RE: BLS Daily Report

To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: BLS Daily Report
From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:28:26 -0800

so what does pen-l think of the following?
>California hospitals will need 5,000 more workers to meet proposed minimum
nurse-staffing levels released Tuesday by California Gov. Gray Davis.
Davis' plan requires a minimum of one nurse for every five patients in
medical wards -- and fewer patients per nurse in labor and delivery,
emergency rooms and critical-care units. (The New York Times, page A15).<

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE: BLS Daily Report
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: RE: Steedman barbeques new growth theory
Next by Date: Re: say it ain't so, Paul!
Previous by thread: BLS Daily Report
Next by thread: Re: RE: BLS Daily Report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- AOL Sues Microsoft Over Browser, ravi Tue 22 Jan 2002, 21:54 GMT
- sentiment, Doug Henwood Tue 22 Jan 2002, 21:42 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 22 Jan 2002, 21:34 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Wed 23 Jan 2002, 22:22 GMT
  - RE: BLS Daily Report, Devine, James Wed 23 Jan 2002, 22:34 GMT
    - Re: RE: BLS Daily Report, Michael Perelman Wed 23 Jan 2002, 22:43 GMT
      
      Re: Re: RE: BLS Daily Report, phillp2 Thu 24 Jan 2002, 01:59 GMT
      
      Re: Re: RE: BLS Daily Report, Ken Hanly Fri 25 Jan 2002, 09:34 GMT
  - RE: Re: RE: BLS Daily Report, Devine, James Wed 23 Jan 2002, 23:01 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]