Perelman not Perlman

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Perelman not Perlman
From: "Charles Brown" <CharlesB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:25:52 -0500

I recall in reading Pashakunis wondering why a Marxist lawyer wouldn't start with private property as the root of study rather than contract and circulation, as Pashakunis did. Micheal Perlman's study of intellectual property is more Marxist jurisprudence in focus in that regard.

Correction: That's  Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: Re: reform and rev
Next by Date: RE: Re: reform and rev
Previous by thread: Argentine crisis: an overview
Next by thread: RE: Perelman not Perlman
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- RE: Re: RE: Steedman barbeques new growth theory, (continued)
  - RE: Re: RE: Steedman barbeques new growth theory, Devine, James Wed 23 Jan 2002, 23:25 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: reform and rev (gabriel kolko), michael pugliese Wed 23 Jan 2002, 18:29 GMT
- China starts construction on Mekong power plant, Ulhas Joglekar Wed 23 Jan 2002, 18:01 GMT
- Marxism and the USSR, michael pugliese Wed 23 Jan 2002, 17:50 GMT
- Perelman not Perlman, Charles Brown Wed 23 Jan 2002, 17:36 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Perelman not Perlman, michael pugliese Wed 23 Jan 2002, 18:02 GMT
    - Re: RE: Perelman not Perlman, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 23 Jan 2002, 18:22 GMT
    - Re: RE: Perelman not Perlman, Peter Dorman Wed 23 Jan 2002, 19:55 GMT
  - RE: Re: RE: Perelman not Perlman, michael pugliese Wed 23 Jan 2002, 19:16 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]