FW: Re: sociological question

["michael pugliese" <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

   George can be sooooooooooooooooo obtuse!
Michael

>--- Original Message ---
>From: George Snedeker <snedeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: michael pugliese <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: 1/19/02 11:16:23 AM
>

>i still can't imagine how people think this is a serious question.
it is an
>ideological hailing as Althusser might put it.
>----- Original Message         -----
>From: michael pugliese <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <snedeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 2:00 PM
>Subject: Re: sociological question
>
>
>>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:38:11 -0500
>> From: "Todd Archer" <todda39@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: sociological question
>>
>> Michael asked:
>>
>> >Does anyone here know of a relatively straightforward study
>> of the sort
>> >of social characteristics that are typical of people who
managed
>> to
>> >catapult themselves from poverty to affluence?
>>
>>
>> Maybe "Money" by Andrew Hacker might have something, and "The
>> Millionaire
>> Next Door" by Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko.
>>
>> Todd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>