Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:21:31 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

I have to run, but Robert Chirinko and Robert Eisner have done work on
this.  bye.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:56:20PM -0500, christian11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
> > Also, interest rates are a very, very weak determinant of investment.
>
> Are you speaking generally? If so, do you know of any good empirical stuff that supports this?
>
> Christian
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev
  - From: christian11

Prev by Date: Re: Re: RE: Krugman.........faux Schumpeterian
Next by Date: Thu., Jan. 24: Harvey Wasserman, "Nuclear Plants = Ticking Time Bombs"
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev
Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: reform and rev, (continued)
  - RE: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev, Devine, James Fri 18 Jan 2002, 17:17 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev, christian11 Fri 18 Jan 2002, 18:01 GMT
    - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev, Michael Perelman Fri 18 Jan 2002, 18:22 GMT
    - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: reform and rev, Rob Schaap Sat 19 Jan 2002, 04:07 GMT
  - RE: Re: Re: reform and rev, michael pugliese Sat 19 Jan 2002, 04:12 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: Re: reform and rev, Rob Schaap Sat 19 Jan 2002, 04:36 GMT
  - Reform and rev, Charles Brown Mon 21 Jan 2002, 17:35 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]