Sweden by Rakesh Bhandari 16 January 2002 19:03 UTC >Wouldn't many bourgeois economists and executives agree? Liquidate, >said Mellon; creative destruction, said Schumpeter; Enron's just the >say things work, said Paul O'Neill just the other day. What's >specifically Marxist about the notion? It's the Keynesians who are >the odd ones out. > >Doug >Rakesh Bhandari wrote: well the so called orthodox marxist answer here is the Keynesians were not the odd ones out (Samuelson was king) until the mixed economy went up in staglationary ashes and its limits thereby exposed. ^^^^^^^ CB: Are you including Victor Perlo and P.I. Nikitin among orthodox marxists ? You aren't claiming that they and other orthodox Marxists claim that Keynesian measures will end the business cycle , are you ?
- Re: Re: Sweden, (continued)
- Re: Re: Sweden, Doug Henwood Wed 16 Jan 2002, 17:32 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Sweden, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 16 Jan 2002, 19:03 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Sweden, Michael Perelman Thu 17 Jan 2002, 03:44 GMT
- Sweden, Charles Brown Thu 17 Jan 2002, 13:21 GMT
- Sweden, Charles Brown Thu 17 Jan 2002, 13:22 GMT
- Re: Sweden, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 17 Jan 2002, 17:52 GMT
- RE: The Enron Prize, Tom Walker Tue 15 Jan 2002, 23:48 GMT
- >Carrol:, Charles Brown Tue 15 Jan 2002, 23:01 GMT
- Re: >Carrol:, Carrol Cox Tue 15 Jan 2002, 23:58 GMT