|
From Today's Headlines in the New York
Times
"A Tattered Andersen Fights for Its Future
Besides Enron itself, no company has been more seriously wounded by its collapse than Arthur Andersen & Company, one of the world's largest accounting firms." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/business/yourmoney/13ANDE.html?todaysheadlines The New York Times article predictably dwells on
the prospects of uncovering "wrong doing" and misses the point. The point
isn't that AA might have stepped over some fuzzy legal line but that the whole
game of big time corporate accounting is predicated on clever evasions, some of
which are unquestionably "legal" but only, of course, because the big five
accounting firms lobbied vigourously to have them accepted as
"standards."
It will be interesting to see how this one plays
out. One's inclination is to expect damage control. But it also seems to me that
the stakes are too high for damage control to be blithely accepted by all the
players. According to the background piece in an NYT story on Enron, Lay
originally was thinking of the name "Enteron" until someone told him it
meant intestines.
Tom Walker
|
- Re: Mark Jones on JP Morgan, Patrick Bond Mon 14 Jan 2002, 06:03 GMT
- more on the 'unlawful combatants', Ian Murray Mon 14 Jan 2002, 04:47 GMT
- in praise of doing nothing, Ian Murray Mon 14 Jan 2002, 03:28 GMT
- the Higher Education in America, Devine, James Mon 14 Jan 2002, 03:06 GMT
- Enron, Arthur Andersen & Co., Tom Walker Mon 14 Jan 2002, 01:42 GMT
- Will Hutton on Enron & productivity, Ian Murray Mon 14 Jan 2002, 01:12 GMT
- FW: [marxistpoliticalthought] VIRUS! sent by FASCIST HACKER!, michael pugliese Mon 14 Jan 2002, 00:51 GMT
- A critique of US treatment of prisoners, Ken Hanly Mon 14 Jan 2002, 00:46 GMT
- ICRC position on detainees, Ken Hanly Mon 14 Jan 2002, 00:22 GMT