BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, JANUARY 27, 2001: In 1997, a commission appointed by the Senate Finance Commission concluded that the annual Consumer Price Index computed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics was probably 1.1 percent too high, and perhaps even more. The Boskin Commission's findings, named after its chairman, Michael Boskin, a Stanford economist who served as President George Bush's chief economic adviser, made headlines in the financial news media and many took its conclusions as gospel, writes Jeff Medrick in "Economic Scene" of The New York Times (page C2). "But perhaps they shouldn't have," contends Medrick. A new comprehensive study sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and partly commissioned by the Bureau of Labor Statistics raises serious questions about just how much the Boskin Commission or anyone else knows about the true rate of inflation. The study, undertaken by a panel of 13 economists from a wide variety of institutions and led by Charles Schultze of the Brookings Institution restores one's faith in cool-headed economic analysis and measured use of economic theory. "It is the report that the Boskin Commission should have done," says Joel Popkin, a Washington economic consultant. The main contention of the Boskin report was that the Labor Department's statistical experts did not fully take into account the improved quality of many products. Jack Triplett, a former BLS economist now with Brookings, says the Boskin Commission analysts of quality increases for cars was simply misinformed. Two government economists, Brent Moulton and Karen Moses, seriously criticize the work on housing and medical care. One of the striking oversights of the Buskin report, I believe, was that it paid almost no attention to areas in which product quality deteriorated, like airline service and education. The most important contribution of the panel, however, was to clarify the central assumptions about the uses of the CPI and other price indexes. But in the early 1960s, a government commission urged BLS to adopt the concept that the index should reflect the cost of maintaining a given "standard of living". Thus, if products improve, the standard of living improves, or it costs less to maintain the old standard of living. The Schultze panel therefore recommends a conditional cost of living index that is relatively unambiguous, including quality adjustments but deliberately leaving out issues like congestion, environmental degradation and consumer expectations. The panel makes no precise estimate of whether the CPI overstates or understates the true rate of inflation. But given the questions the panel raises about the commission's central assumptions and its analysis of specific product areas, the claim that the CPI has been and may remain seriously overstated is not nearly as clear cut as many economists have assumed. The Consumer Price Index, the main gauge of inflation and a bedrock statistics of the Federal Government, announced each month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is a surprisingly frail number, says Jolie Solomon, writing in The New York Times of December 23, page 4 of the "Money & Business" section. The calculations behind it are as much art as they are science. But that has begun to change. Starting next month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will use some of the freshest data it has ever collected. It will readjust the weight of importance of goods and services in the index market basket, and the stores were they are sampled, far more often than it did in the past. Whether these changes will change the official inflation rate significantly is unclear. But it is hard to underestimate the potential impact. The CPI is not just a measure of living costs, it is used to help determine the size of social security checks, veterans benefits, and other federal payments to about 80 million people. It affects how the Federal Reserve sets interest rates and how the Internal Revenue Service adjusts tax brackets. It can even change the size of alimony checks. The changes are meant to better reflect consumer behavior and, in turn, to give policy makers, businesses, and consumers a better tool to gauge how social and technological changes affect inflation. Two income households, for example, mean more spending on takeout food and day care New attitudes toward health may mean less spending on cigarettes and soft drinks. The shift toward work outside the office means more purchases of products like laptop computers and pagers. The rapid growth of grocery warehouses means that consumers are buying more food in bulk and at lower prices. In the past, such trends took years to affect the index because the bureau's market basket was based on consumer buying patterns surveyed 5, 10, or even more years earlier. The current index, for example, is based on consumer behavior in 1993-95. When the bureau releases its January report on the index it will use new "relative weights" for products and services based on consumer choices in 1999 and 2000. Taken together, the changes should make the index more timely. Patrick C/ Jackman, a bureau economist who is considered its top authority on the index, offered one example: Viagra, the male impotence drug introduced in 1998, was moved into the index in 2000. Starting next year, the bureau will measure experimentally a more subtle variable: what happens when consumers buy one product instead of another that has risen in price. The bureau began accounting for substitution in a rudimentary way in 1999. This might mean switching from Golden Delicious to Granny Smith apples. As an experiment, in 2002, the bureau will do this kind of calculation across categories -- measuring what happens when a shopper buys chicken, for example, because the price of lamb has increased. The United States is on pace to record more job losses in 2001 than it has in at least 9 years, the job placement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas said. Since the terrorist attacks on September 11, U.S. companies have announced 624,411 cuts, more than the 12-month totals for every year from 1993 to 1997, the placement firm said. Through the end of November, companies had announced close to 1.8 million job cuts in 2001, nearly 3 times as many as were announced in 2000, and the largest number since Challenger began tabulating figures in 1993 (The Washington Post, page E2; http://www.nandotimes.com/business/story/202867p-1970267c.html).. Retailers slashed prices as much as 75 percent off goods that were passed over earlier in what is expected to be the worse holiday sales season in 16 years. Shoppers reduced their spending because of the recession, leaving stores with as much as 20 percent more inventory at the end of this month than a year ago, said Britt Beemer, chairman of America's Research Group, a retail consulting firm. Chains may sacrifice profits this quarter with discounts on old goods to make room for new ones they can try to sell at full price. The clearance markdowns will reduce fourth-quarter profit margins analysts say (Associated Press, The Washington Post, page E3). The weighted average first-year wage increase in newly negotiated labor contracts was 4.2 percent in the year 2001, compared with 3.8 percent in 2000, according to data compiled by the Bureau of National Affairs in 2001. The median first-year wage increase for these settlements was 3.5 percent, compared with 3.4 percent the prior year. The manufacturing industry weighted average increase was 3.1 percent, compared with 3.2 percent, while nonmanufacturing contracts, excluding construction agreements, showed a weighted average gain of 4.3 percent in 2001, compared with 4 percent in 2000 (Daily Labor Report, pages D-1, D-2). While private-sector technology spending sinks, federal spending on information technology is budgeted to increase by $1.3 billion in this fiscal year to $46.3 billion, according to Federal Sources, Inc., a McLean, Va. research firm. And that was before the September terrorist attacks. The Government Electronics and Information Technology Association predicts that federal spending on information technology will jump 15 percent this year, growing from $42.7 billion in fiscal 2001 to $49 billion in 2002 and reaching $65 billion in fiscal 2007. Federal Sources estimates that between $750 million and $1 billion of the $40 billion requested by President Bush for emergency spending related to the attacks will go to information technology. State and local governments are also clamoring to create their own homeland security programs (The Washington Post, page E1). The bulk of those without health insurance are working adults who aren't old enough for Medicare. About 75 percent of the Americans between 18 and 65 who didn't have health insurance during 2000 worked during the year, according to the page 1 feature "Capital" by David Wessel in The Wall Street Journal. In 2000, 14 percent of all Americans went the whole year without health insurance, according to Census Bureau data. Employees in the United States have fewer vacation days than employees in most other countries, according to a page D1 graph in USA Today. The United States has only 13 vacation days, while Italy has 42, France 37, Germany 35, Brazil 34, United Kingdom 28, Canada 26, and Korea and Japan 25. Source of the data is given as AAA World and World Trade Organization.
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- RE: Re: RE: Enron's Success Story, (continued)
- RE: Re: RE: Enron's Success Story, Devine, James Thu 27 Dec 2001, 00:52 GMT
- RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Enron's Success Story, Devine, James Thu 27 Dec 2001, 18:32 GMT
- FW: [Arg_Solid]Fidel supports the direction adopted by interim Argentgine President, michael pugliese Wed 26 Dec 2001, 21:26 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Wed 26 Dec 2001, 21:10 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 28 Dec 2001, 15:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Fiscal Crisis of the State, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 26 Dec 2001, 17:53 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Fiscal Crisis of the State, Max Sawicky Thu 27 Dec 2001, 17:25 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Fiscal Crisis of the State, Michael Perelman Wed 26 Dec 2001, 22:24 GMT
- layoff's, Ian Murray Wed 26 Dec 2001, 07:42 GMT