PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: RE: No recognition for Enduring Freedom!
Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> lots of people are sympathetic to the
> Shrub precisely because he's unininterested, not too bright, and not very
> well-informed--sort of like them. So making fun of him for being a moron, as
> opposed to despising his politics, is probably a political mistake.
>
I keep remembering Eisenhower's years, when everyone had a ball mocking
his clumsy rhetoric and suggesting he wasn't too bright. It was a hoax,
a rather deliberate one. It is particularly unwise to try to estimate
intelligence on the basis of someone's command of language: that can be
very deceptive. It is quite possible for highly intelligent people to be
consistent bumblers in their speaking and writing.
Never underestimate an enemy.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- 'War on Terror': PR problems in non-Anglo-Saxon world #x to the nth power, (continued)
- No recognition for Enduring Freedom!,
Ken Hanly Sun 23 Dec 2001, 06:06 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: No recognition for Enduring Freedom!,
Devine, James Sun 23 Dec 2001, 16:25 GMT
- Re: RE: No recognition for Enduring Freedom!,
Justin Schwartz Sun 23 Dec 2001, 16:33 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: No recognition for Enduring Freedom!,
Justin Schwartz Sun 23 Dec 2001, 20:01 GMT
- FW: Re: RE: No recognition for Enduring Freedom!,
Devine, James Tue 25 Dec 2001, 18:58 GMT
- Fw:[ASDnet] MR's dishonest use of Unocal's Testimony,
michael pugliese Sun 23 Dec 2001, 06:04 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]