> BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DAILY REPORT, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001: > > RELEASED TODAY: A total of 148.6 million persons worked at some point > during 2000, an increase of about 1 million persons from the prior year, > according to the annual survey of work experience released by the Bureau > of Labor Statistics. The number of individuals who experience some > unemployment during the year continued to decline. About 12.3 million > individuals were in this category in 2000, down about 800,000 from 1999. > These data are from the March 2001 supplement to the Current Population > Survey (CPS), a monthly survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for the > Bureau of Labor Statistics. > > Local government jobs rose 2.2 percent to 13.5 million in October from > September, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics (The Wall Street Journal, > "Work Week" feature, page 1). > > U.S. companies in October announced 242,192 job cuts, according to the > outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, which attributed the high > number to the September 11 attacks. October was the second highest month > for job cuts this year, following September. October 2001 job cuts were > 453 percent higher than in October 2000, when 43,799 job cuts were > announced. So far this year, 1.6 million jobs have been eliminated, 1 > million more than in all of 2000, Challenger said. The Chicago-based firm > said 442,999 or 90 percent of the September and October job cuts occurred > after September 11. The telecommunications industry was the hardest hit > in October, with 42,347 layoffs. So far this year, 266,578 job cuts have > been announced in the industry, according to the report (Daily Labor > Report, page A-1). > > The terrorists who attacked the World Trade Center may have been trying to > crush American capitalism and its masters of the universe on Wall Street. > But the economic impact of the attack is felling a very different group of > people: cooks, cabdrivers, sales clerks and seamstresses. Workers in > traditionally low-wage industries, like restaurants and hotels, retailing > and transportation, have been hit hard in the fallout from September 11, > according to a new analysis from the New York State Department of Labor. > And a report released yesterday by the labor-backed Fiscal Policy > Institute forecasts that almost 80,000 people will have lost their jobs by > the end of the year and that 60 percent of these positions paid an average > of $23,000 a year. That is far below the citywide average salary of > roughly $58,000. "The spillover effects hit the retail and service > industries very hard in New York City, says James Parrott, the chief > economist for the Institute. "And those tend to be lower-wage jobs (The > New York Times, page B1). > > In 2002, key industries must face their unions, says The Wall Street > Journal in its "Work Week" feature (page 1). "Next year is going to be a > big bargaining year," says Richard Bank, director of the AFL-CIO center > for collective bargaining. > > Business activity in the services sector dropped 9.6 percentage points in > October, to a record low 40.6 percent from 50.2 percent in September, the > National Association of Purchasing Management reports. Only health > services showed increased business activity in October (Daily Labor > Report, page A-6). > > The U.S. service sector contracted sharply during October, showing more > weakness than expected (The Wall Street Journal, page A8). > > The depth and breadth of the slump in the technology sector is greater > than past downturns, and has abruptly transformed the technology industry > in the West, to a drag on the region's economy from an engine of growth, > according to an analysis of the San Francisco Federal Reserve. The > analysis by San Francisco Fed Senior Economist Mary Daly, notes that not > only is the slump in high technology manufacturing the deepest in more > than a decade, but for the first time since at least 1990, it also > coincides with a slide in the technology-services sector, which includes > software and Internet companies (The Wall Street Journal, page A2). > > High-tech's economic clout is nearly 2 times greater in the western United > States than in the rest of the country, according to a Federal Reserve > report. High-tech paychecks cover 14.6 percent of the nonfarm wages in > the nine Western states that comprise the Fed's western district, compared > to 7.5 percent in the rest of the country, the report said. The > industry's impact on jobs in the West isn't as dramatic. High-tech > employers account for 6 percent of the jobs in the Western states, > slightly above the 4 percent rate outside the region. High-tech packs the > biggest payroll punch in California, home to the Silicon Valley, and > Washington state, home to Microsoft. High-tech accounts for 17 percent of > the nonfarm wages in California and 16 percent in Washington, the report > said. (Associated Press, > http://www0.mercurycenter.com/business/tops/009969.htm). > > Across the country, businesses in the security, defense, pharmaceutical > and certain other industries have maintained or expanded their hiring > during the past 8 weeks. But with unemployment now at a 5-year high, many > of these employers face the conundrum of a mismatch between their openings > and the growing pool of eager takers (The Wall Street Journal, page B1). > > This year the Labor Department counted 14,405 so-called mass layoffs, each > involving 50 or more workers, for a total of 1.7 million filing claims for > unemployment benefits. That's up about 45 percent from a year earlier. > During that same period, smaller firms, it appeared from anecdotal > evidence, weren't putting quite so many people out of work. That's because > privately held smaller companies don't have public stockholders and Wall > Street analysts clamoring for cost cuts at the first sign of a slowdown. > This appears to be changing, however, and accelerating layoffs at smaller > employers could lead to a deeper and longer recession. The Labor > Department doesn't categorize layoffs according to size of business. But > two big payroll-processing companies, each handling hundreds of thousands > of mostly smaller firms' paychecks, have in recent weeks seen relatively > sharp declines in employment levels at their clients. That, coupled with > Friday's increase in the national employment rate to 5.4 percent in > October from 4.9 percent in September is troubling news for the economy > (The Wall Street Journal, page B2). > > DUE OUT TOMORROW: Productivity and Costs -- Third Quarter 2001 > (Preliminary). >
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Re: BLS Daily Report, (continued)
- Re: BLS Daily Report, Jim Devine Fri 02 Nov 2001, 20:44 GMT
- Re: BLS Daily Report, SOncu Sat 03 Nov 2001, 00:01 GMT
- Re: Re: BLS Daily Report, Jim Devine Sat 03 Nov 2001, 00:21 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 06 Nov 2001, 15:48 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Wed 07 Nov 2001, 16:20 GMT
- BLS Daily report, Richardson_D Wed 07 Nov 2001, 21:56 GMT
- Enduring freedom campaign in Afghanistan, Ken Hanly Thu 01 Nov 2001, 16:40 GMT
- SUSAN TOMPOR: Spend, save, but also plan to survive the tumble, Charles Brown Thu 01 Nov 2001, 13:47 GMT
- Re: failing firms must be "promptly liquidated", Chris Burford Thu 01 Nov 2001, 08:02 GMT