Re: Re: Chomsky must apologize

To: "pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: Chomsky must apologize
From: "Andrew Hagen" <xah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:47:02 -0500

On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:39:15 -0700, Michael Perelman wrote:

>pretty persumptious, don't you think?

I stand by what I've written.

Andrew Hagen
xah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Chomsky must apologize
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: Re: Identity of Hijackers.
Next by Date: Re: Chomsky must apologize
Previous by thread: Re: Chomsky must apologize
Next by thread: Re: Chomsky must apologize
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Fw: Wolin vs. Hitchens, Michael Pugliese Sat 22 Sep 2001, 03:36 GMT
- Robert Fisk..., Ian Murray Sat 22 Sep 2001, 01:43 GMT
- Chomsky must apologize, Andrew Hagen Sat 22 Sep 2001, 01:32 GMT
  - Re: Chomsky must apologize, Michael Perelman Sat 22 Sep 2001, 01:40 GMT
    - Re: Re: Chomsky must apologize, Andrew Hagen Sat 22 Sep 2001, 01:49 GMT
  - Re: Chomsky must apologize, Stephen E Philion Sat 22 Sep 2001, 02:04 GMT
- Quote of the Week, Steve Diamond Sat 22 Sep 2001, 00:54 GMT
  - Re: Quote of the Week, Michael Pugliese Sat 22 Sep 2001, 02:36 GMT
- Petition (or letter), Ken Hanly Fri 21 Sep 2001, 21:42 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]