|
Jim,
I think the use of the word crusade was consciously
chosen, but not to "offend" the Arab world generally. My understanding is that
he used it once, there was some protest but then he used it again. I think
the aim is to see what kind of reaction there was to the use of the word in the
Middle East. Bin Laden's propaganda calls for a jihad against the
"Crusaders and the Jews." Thus, I think the aim of the Bush regime was to
see if using the word would cause a negative reaction in the Middle East and
then they would have some measure of the popular support for bin Laden.
There has been little such public support and the
the general strike called for today in Pakistan was a bust. I think the
confidence of the Bush people is growing, that they have a green light from
Congress, very little opposition internationally and that an intense six month
war will get underway within a week to ten days. At the end of six months,
unless he has clear results, then he may have some problems.
|
- Re: Re: Bertrand Russell on class war, (continued)
- Re: Re: Bertrand Russell on class war, Doug Henwood Fri 21 Sep 2001, 21:49 GMT
- Re: Re: Bertrand Russell on class war, Jim Devine Fri 21 Sep 2001, 22:42 GMT
- Re: Bertrand Russell on class war, Andrew Hagen Fri 21 Sep 2001, 23:08 GMT
- Re: Re: Bertrand Russell on class war, Justin Schwartz Sat 22 Sep 2001, 04:18 GMT
- Fw: "Crusade", Steve Diamond Fri 21 Sep 2001, 19:03 GMT
- Turkish newspaper translation???, Steve Diamond Fri 21 Sep 2001, 18:56 GMT
- Muslim fundamentalism, Karl Carlile Fri 21 Sep 2001, 17:57 GMT
- Fw: Translation of an article from a turkish newspaper, Karl Carlile Fri 21 Sep 2001, 17:57 GMT
- Teach ins making a comeback, Stephen E Philion Fri 21 Sep 2001, 16:45 GMT