Re: Not good

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Not good
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:45:03 -0400

Tom Walker wrote:

The "patriotic rally" following Bush's speech doesn't appear to be
materializing. European markets slid 7%. NASDAQ gapped down nearly 6% at the
opening. S&P down 4%. Investors seem to be shouting (with their money),
"Hell no, we won't go!"


Ok, we're on the PEN-L bear watch again. What do you think we should
do if the market keeps falling? Just what does it mean that it does?
If it means a very bad economy ahead, what does that mean? Right now
you're sounding like the color guy in the ICU, and not much else.

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- PEN-L bear watch
  - From: Chris Burford

References:
- Not good
  - From: Tom Walker

Prev by Date: Teach ins making a comeback
Next by Date: Not Good
Previous by thread: Re: Not good
Next by thread: PEN-L bear watch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: Identity of Hijackers., (continued)
- AIRLINES IN TROUBLE: Analysts see a tough market for carriers, Charles Brown Fri 21 Sep 2001, 13:54 GMT
- Not good, Tom Walker Fri 21 Sep 2001, 13:45 GMT
  - Re: Not good, Ian Murray Fri 21 Sep 2001, 14:00 GMT
  - Re: Not good, Doug Henwood Fri 21 Sep 2001, 16:50 GMT
    - PEN-L bear watch, Chris Burford Fri 21 Sep 2001, 21:26 GMT
      
      Re: PEN-L bear watch, Michael Perelman Fri 21 Sep 2001, 21:41 GMT
      
      Re: Re: PEN-L bear watch, Doug Henwood Fri 21 Sep 2001, 21:46 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Not good, Tom Walker Fri 21 Sep 2001, 14:44 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]