Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333
From: "Ian Murray" <seamus2001@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:31:04 -0700

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eugene Coyle" <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx>
To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:20 AM
>Subject: [PEN-L:17416] Re: UN Resolution 1333


> Capturing bin Laden is the last thing the US wants.  How can you
justify
> bombing people if you already have an accused in custody?
>
> Gene Coyle
>
========>

Since when has any of this been about justification and it's limits?

Ian

References:
- UN Resolution 1333
  - From: Ken Hanly
- Re: UN Resolution 1333
  - From: Eugene Coyle

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Re: RE: what's going on
Next by Date: Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333
Previous by thread: Re: UN Resolution 1333
Next by thread: Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- A Russian Viewpoint, Ken Hanly Wed 19 Sep 2001, 16:01 GMT
- Agree to US demands or you may be bombed., Ken Hanly Wed 19 Sep 2001, 15:17 GMT
- UN Resolution 1333, Ken Hanly Wed 19 Sep 2001, 15:14 GMT
  - Re: UN Resolution 1333, Eugene Coyle Wed 19 Sep 2001, 18:21 GMT
    - Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333, Ian Murray Wed 19 Sep 2001, 18:29 GMT
    - Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333, Doug Henwood Wed 19 Sep 2001, 18:37 GMT
      
      Re: Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333, Eugene Coyle Wed 19 Sep 2001, 19:07 GMT
    - Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333, Jim Devine Wed 19 Sep 2001, 19:10 GMT
      
      Re: Re: Re: UN Resolution 1333, Eugene Coyle Wed 19 Sep 2001, 23:34 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]