PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: shooting down airplanes
At 16/09/01 18:43 -0500, you wrote:
Although it seems no plane was actually shot down the plane that crashed
would have been shot down as fighters were not that far away when it
crashed.
This adds another unreported twist to the deadly game of guarding against
terrorism. Now a terrorist group intent on suicide, only has to take over a
plane and head in the *general* direction of say, the London Stock
Exchange. If they do not hit it, they will be shot down, over a crowded
famous city. Either way they will be dead, and either way there will be a
sensational atrocity.
Now every pilot cockpit, especially of the smaller planes, will have to be
sealed and armoured before take off.
And every air traveller, can now add this anxiety to their flight phobias.
It is not enough to fear being taken hostage. The air force may have to
ensure you join the suicide bombers in their moment of liberation.
Build that into the economics of air travel!
Chris Burford
London
- Thread context:
- Re: [REDYOUTH] ISRAEL/USA CONSPIRACY BEHIND COLLAPSE OF WORLD TRADE CENTER ?,
Michael Pugliese Mon 17 Sep 2001, 01:10 GMT
- Gadaffi speech,
Ken Hanly Sun 16 Sep 2001, 23:59 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Gadaffi speech,
Michael Keaney Mon 17 Sep 2001, 14:17 GMT
- policy on shooting down airplanes,
Ken Hanly Sun 16 Sep 2001, 23:50 GMT
- Barnett Rubin essay,
Steve Diamond Sun 16 Sep 2001, 23:33 GMT
- William Easterly on the World Bank,
Michael Perelman Sun 16 Sep 2001, 23:08 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]