Gar Lipow wrote:
Also there is one other point. In the U.S, anyway the increase in the ratio of seniors to others is projected to occur alongside a drop in the ratio of children to population -- so that the total "dependency" ratio is projected to be a only a tiny bit higher than at present...
If you calculate the number of nonworkers per worker, even the rather dire official Social Security calculations show only a minor rise, to levels well below those of the 1950s and 1960s.
Doug
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, Ian Murray Mon 03 Sep 2001, 23:07 GMT
- business ethics, Jim Devine Tue 04 Sep 2001, 03:21 GMT
- Re: business ethics, Ian Murray Tue 04 Sep 2001, 03:59 GMT
- Re: business ethics, Gar Lipow Tue 04 Sep 2001, 05:36 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, Doug Henwood Mon 03 Sep 2001, 16:21 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, Michael Perelman Mon 03 Sep 2001, 16:49 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, Doug Henwood Mon 03 Sep 2001, 17:02 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, Tim Bousquet Mon 03 Sep 2001, 17:07 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged, Max Sawicky Mon 03 Sep 2001, 18:34 GMT