Re: RE: Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade
From: "Ian Murray" <seamus2001@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:22:46 -0700

> Ian Murray wrote:
>
> <<<Not that we need to embrace asceticism by any means, by why
was/is
> Buddha the exception and not the 'rule' in dealing with the
psychology
> of wealth?>>>
>
> I don't know.  Maybe you should try an evolutionary psychology list.
They
> have an answer for everything.
>
> David Shemano

==============
Except for why their models of mind and culture are woefully
inadequate for dealing with the complexities of life under
capitalism...

Ian

References:
- RE: Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade
  - From: David Shemano

Prev by Date: RE: Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade
Next by Date: U.S. Iraq attack to involve ground troops White House plans multi-pronged offensive against Hussein
Previous by thread: RE: Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade
Next by thread: Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: neomercantilism, trade, (continued)
- FW: Oklahoma Anti-"Right-to-Work" Petition, Max Sawicky Wed 29 Aug 2001, 16:30 GMT
  - Re: FW: Oklahoma Anti-"Right-to-Work" Petition, Jim Devine Wed 29 Aug 2001, 17:54 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Re: FW: Oklahoma Anti-"Right-to-Work" Petition, michael pugliese Wed 29 Aug 2001, 18:41 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]