> BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DAILY REPORT, FRIDAY, AUGUST 24, 2001: > > Initial claims filed with state agencies for unemployment insurance > increased by a modest 8,000 to a total of 393,000 during the week ending > August 18, according to the Employment and Training Administration. The > more closely watched 4-week moving average of initial UI claims -- that > smooths fluctuations in the volatile weekly data -- showed an increase of > 6,750 to a total of 378,750 for that period of time. The insured > unemployment rate was 2.5 percent for the week ended August 18, up 0.1 > percentage point from the prior week. About a year ago, the rate stood at > 1.7 percent (Daily Labor Report, page D-1; Bloomberg News, The New York > Times, page C7; The Wall Street Journal, page A2). > > Even as layoff announcements rack up, national unemployment rates have > held steady at 4.5 percent for 2 months. The Bureau of Labor Statistics > reports that the median time it took most people to find new jobs in July > was 6.7 weeks, only a few days longer than in March. Forecasters say the > labor market is near an equilibrium of firings and hirings -- even in > light of signals that more workers are collecting jobless benefits in the > slow-growing economy. The Labor Department yesterday reported that new > applications for unemployment insurance rose to 393,000 for the week ended > August 18, an increase of 8,000. The total number of workers receiving > the benefits rose to 3.18 million as of August 11, compared with 3.08 > million a week before. Economists said the national unemployment rate > could rise modestly next month based on the data released yesterday, but > they predicted it would still be well below 5 percent. Labor Department > statistics indicate that the private sector lost a total of 162,000 jobs > in May, June, and July -- offset somewhat by gains in government payrolls. > Before March 2001, the economy had created new jobs steadily since late > 1996. Workers are understandably concerned about whether the job cuts will > eventually reach deeper. But today's employment numbers are best > understood in the context of the overall labor market, which grew > dramatically in the last half of the 1990s as many people who had not > previously worked or held temporary jobs entered the ranks of the > full-time workforce. For that reason alone, experts say this is a > different kind of downturn (The Washington Post, page E1). > > The Philadelphia Fed report shows that economists expect the unemployment > rate to average 4.6 percent this year, higher than the previous projection > of 4.5 percent. The monthly rate has been either 4.5 percent or 4.4 > percent since April. The rate will climb to 4.9 percent next year, the > economists says (Bloomberg News, The New York Times, page C7). > > The average U.S. family earned $63,410 during the previous 12 months, > according to Census 2000. A breakdown of what the USA's 70.8 million > families earned in the previous year as shown in a page 1A graph in USA > Today shows: 22.0 percent earned between $50,000 and $74,999; 23.3 > percent earned between $15,000 and $34,999; 16.8 earned $35,000 to > $49,999; 12.3 percent earned between $75,000 and $99,999; 10.4 percent > earned less than $15,000; 9.7 percent earned between $100,000 and > $149,999; and 5.5 percent earned $150,000 and over. > > Orders to American factories for big ticket manufactured goods fell in > July for the third time in the last 4 months. But in brighter news, sales > of new homes last month surged by 4.9 percent, the biggest gain this year. > The weakness in manufacturing continued to reflect slumping demand by > businesses for new equipment. This weakness, however, has been offset by > continued strong consumer demand which so far has been enough to keep the > yearlong economic slowdown from turning into a recession. The Commerce > Department said today that sales of new homes in July were up by the > largest amount since a 13.5 percent increase last December. The July > increase followed a revised 2.8 percent sales gain in June and pushed > sales of single-family homes to an annual rate of 950,000 last month > (Martin Crutsinger, Associated Press, > http://www.boston.com/dailynews/236/economy/Orders_for_big_ticket_manufact > :.shtml). >
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Forwarded from Sabri, Michael Perelman Thu 23 Aug 2001, 20:48 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Forwarded from Sabri, Michael Perelman Fri 24 Aug 2001, 21:24 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Thu 23 Aug 2001, 19:55 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Thu 23 Aug 2001, 20:06 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Mon 27 Aug 2001, 15:22 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 28 Aug 2001, 15:31 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 28 Aug 2001, 19:47 GMT
- Oops ! Bush blew the surplus ? That quick !?, Charles Brown Thu 23 Aug 2001, 19:43 GMT
- RE: Oops ! Bush blew the surplus ? That quick !?, Max Sawicky Thu 23 Aug 2001, 20:29 GMT