silence <> assent

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: silence <> assent
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:08:43 -0400
Cc: Liza Featherstone <lfeather32@xxxxxxxxx>

Liza Featherstone & I have both decided that it's best not to respond
to Rakesh's posts, which seem motivated more by personal hostility
than genuine political content. Please don't mistake our silence for
assent.

Doug

Prev by Date: Re: RE: sawicky on lind
Next by Date: Re: Re: sawicky on lind
Previous by thread: Intellectual property and YOU
Next by thread: Re: silence <> assent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Many State Treasuries Are Running Dry, Stephen E Philion Thu 23 Aug 2001, 16:43 GMT
- WB/IMF reconstructing capitalism yet again- !!??, Charles Brown Thu 23 Aug 2001, 16:21 GMT
  - Re: WB/IMF reconstructing capitalism yet again- !!??, Ian Murray Thu 23 Aug 2001, 17:15 GMT
- Overly pessimistic view ?, Charles Brown Thu 23 Aug 2001, 15:44 GMT
- silence <> assent, Doug Henwood Thu 23 Aug 2001, 15:10 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: silence <> assent, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 23 Aug 2001, 15:21 GMT
    - Re: Re: silence <> assent, Stephen E Philion Thu 23 Aug 2001, 15:49 GMT
      
      Re: Re: silence <> assent, Doug Henwood Thu 23 Aug 2001, 16:26 GMT
    - Re: Re: silence <> assent, Michael Perelman Thu 23 Aug 2001, 15:57 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]