PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Brekky table gossip
Jim Devine wrote,
>and why do these financial whizzes care about a statistic for only one
>quarter, one that will likely be revised within the next year or so? (See
>Dean Baker's comment on these stats, how revisions make the "New Economy"
>look more paltry.) They deserve their fate if they are so superficial.
The revision was for the 1996-2000 period. Your comment on superficiality
still holds, though.
Tom Walker
Bowen Island, BC
604 947 2213
- Thread context:
- Mommy, what will be better than 'globalization' ?,
Ian Murray Wed 08 Aug 2001, 03:46 GMT
- running out of energy?,
Eugene Coyle Tue 07 Aug 2001, 21:03 GMT
- Re: Brekky table gossip,
Tom Walker Tue 07 Aug 2001, 15:28 GMT
- Productivity Byte, 8/7/01 by Dean Baker: Productivity Revisions Tarnish New Economy,
Robert Naiman Tue 07 Aug 2001, 15:09 GMT
- Bush slips on the oil market,
Chris Burford Tue 07 Aug 2001, 07:36 GMT
- The TimeWork Web restored,
Tom Walker Tue 07 Aug 2001, 05:36 GMT
- Argentina,
Ian Murray Tue 07 Aug 2001, 03:01 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]