PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Wealth effect or swoon effect?
G'day all,
Another in my futile series of posing ridiculous propositions in the hope of
getting edifyingly corrected.
I see world markets have 'rallied' (y'always have to put that in apostraphes
because these things only ever last about four days) on account of 'better
than expected' consumer sentiment/splurge.
I'm left wondering how much the rich have to do with this. My guess is quite
a bit (especially if you count the Veblenian emulation spin-off). I'm
thinking that because I was fantasising this morning about being rich (just
didn't have the energy for the usual Wednesday morning Emma Peel fantasy), and
found myself thinking, well, I certainly wouldn't be plonking it on the
markets for the moment. Which leads to the question, are market-ameliorating
consumer numbers a function of the fact the markets are sagging?
Seeing contradictions everywhere,
Rob.
- Thread context:
- Re: Krugman: Dollar as Ponzi scheme, (continued)
- Colombia's 'other coke' problem,
Michael Pugliese Wed 01 Aug 2001, 16:30 GMT
- Brame, NLRB Far Rightist...,
Michael Pugliese Wed 01 Aug 2001, 16:29 GMT
- Labor rights redux,
Ian Murray Wed 01 Aug 2001, 16:17 GMT
- Wealth effect or swoon effect?,
Rob Schaap Wed 01 Aug 2001, 12:18 GMT
- Fw: New roadblocks in Argentina,
Michael Pugliese Wed 01 Aug 2001, 12:12 GMT
- Re: Jamie Galbraith,
Rob Schaap Wed 01 Aug 2001, 11:55 GMT
- Thousands Block Roads to Protest Austerity Plan,
Michael Pugliese Wed 01 Aug 2001, 11:04 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]