And there is much capitalist industry that can, without great disagreement among socialists, be decommissioned. That pertaining to the military sector would be a good place to start. Michael K.
Military spending is 2% of OECD GDP, of which only 1/4 is the procurement of products that are peculiarly military. We don't live in the late 1950s, when military spending was 10% of GDP and even Eisenhower was scared of the military-industrial complex.
Try to keep your arguments from being more than one generation out of date, OK?
Brad DeLong
- Networks and niches, not nomenklatura, (continued)
- Networks and niches, not nomenklatura, Keaney Michael Wed 11 Jul 2001, 12:40 GMT
- New Labour and MI5, Keaney Michael Tue 10 Jul 2001, 12:13 GMT
- Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Keaney Michael Tue 10 Jul 2001, 12:03 GMT
- Re: Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 10 Jul 2001, 13:30 GMT
- Re: Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Brad DeLong Tue 10 Jul 2001, 21:03 GMT
- Re: Re: Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Michael Perelman Tue 10 Jul 2001, 21:18 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Keaney Michael Tue 10 Jul 2001, 13:13 GMT
- Re: Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 10 Jul 2001, 13:42 GMT
- Re: Deindustrialization? (was Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak), Stephen E Philion Tue 10 Jul 2001, 17:33 GMT