Ken Hanly wrote:
I think most people agree with you to the following: 1)there is an impending global energy shortage that will cause a crisis within capitalism 2) the New Economy doesn't alter the fact that capitalism is dependent upon traditional energy sources
I'm not sure I agree with 1); it's been wrongly asserted so many times in the past - staring over 100 years ago - that one should be pretty careful about predicting it again.
I notice that Mark forwarded an item from the FT about a dry hole in Azerbaijan. There was a story next to that in the print edition of the paper on Japanese investment in Iran which will develop that country's reserves and production capacity. But I guess a glass at 50% capacity is always half empty.
Doug
- RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, (continued)
- RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Mark Jones Sun 08 Jul 2001, 16:30 GMT
- Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Sam Pawlett Mon 09 Jul 2001, 05:51 GMT
- RE: Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Mark Jones Mon 09 Jul 2001, 11:53 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Ken Hanly Mon 09 Jul 2001, 15:47 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Doug Henwood Mon 09 Jul 2001, 17:20 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Jim Devine Mon 09 Jul 2001, 17:39 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Ian Murray Mon 09 Jul 2001, 17:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Yet another take on Hubbert's peak, Ann Li Mon 09 Jul 2001, 19:32 GMT
- Humid peek, Jim Devine Mon 09 Jul 2001, 19:46 GMT