> BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, FRIDAY, JUNE 29, 2001: > > RELEASED TODAY; In March 2001, employer costs for employee compensation > for civilian workers in private industry and State and local government in > the United States averaged $22.15 per hour worked, the U.S. Department of > Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. Wags and salaries, which > averaged $16.07, accounted for approximately 73 percent of these costs, > while benefits, which averaged $6.08, accounted for the remaining 27 > percent. > > Reflecting the weakened labor market, both the number of mass layoff > events and the number of workers involved were significantly higher during > the first 5 months of this year than in the same period of 2000, according > to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The latest figures underscored the > continued decline of manufacturing employment, as factory layoffs made up > a larger share of the total than was the case last year. The layoff > events reported for May involved a total of 155,759 workers, about 18,000 > fewer than in April (Daily Labor Report, page D-1). > > Several factors are combining to constrain the current supply of nurses in > the United States, a key factor being job dissatisfaction, according to > the General Accounting Office. "Inadequate staffing, heavy workloads, and > the use of overtime to address staffing shortages are frequently cited as > key areas of job dissatisfaction among nurses," GAO's director of health > care and public health issues, testified at a June 27 congressional > hearing. She cited a recent survey conducted by the Federation of Nurses > and Health Professionals finding that half of registered nurses currently > employed had considered leaving the patient care field for reasons other > than retirement during the past 2 years.(Daily Labor Report, page A-5). > > The Conference Board finds that demand for labor declined in May, as the > help-wanted advertising index fell by 5 percentage points from the > previous month, to 60 percent. The decline in the help-wanted ads index > may indicate another drop in employment levels in June, said an economist > at the Conference Board. In May 2000, the index was at 83 percent. "Most > major regions of the country have experienced 20-25 percent declines in > want-ad volume over the past year, with most of these loses taking place > over the last 3 months," he said (Daily Labor Report, page A-5). > > The U.S. economy limped along in the first 3 months of the year, at a pace > slightly slower than the government previously thought. The biggest drag > on growth came from companies struggling to get rid of their unsold goods. > Gross domestic product, the country's total output of goods and services, > grew at an annual rate of 1.2 percent from January to March, according to > revised figures released by the Commerce Department. The weak economy and > higher energy prices took a bite out of U.S. companies' profits in the > first quarter, which registered their biggest decline in 3 years (Jeannine > Aversa, Associated Press, http://www.nypost.com/apstories/V0109.htm; > http://www0.mercurycenter.com/breaking/headline2/019692.htm; > http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/businessnews/article/0,2669,ART-527 > 16,FF.html; http://www.nandotimes.com/business/story/34833p-576743c.html). > > Energy prices, which helped drive the economy to the brink of recession, > are declining and could be crucial in reviving growth, says Greg Ip, > writing in The Wall Street Journal (page A2). Rising production, moderate > weather and weakening demand have helped reduce prices of natural gas, > gasoline and Western wholesale electricity to below year-ago levels and > return inventories to a comfortable range. If sustained, the drop in > prices, combined with a tax cut and lower interest rates, helps increase > the likelihood of an economic recovery in coming months. But here is the > catch: Prices have dropped in part because slowing economies in the U.S. > and abroad have lessened demand. A sharp rebound in growth could tighten > supplies and cause prices to rise. >
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Re: Lying About Vietnam (and lying about economics), (continued)
- Re: Lying About Vietnam (and lying about economics), Michael Pugliese Fri 29 Jun 2001, 15:47 GMT
- Re: Lying About Vietnam (and lying about economics), Tom Walker Fri 29 Jun 2001, 16:59 GMT
- STOP!, Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 15:15 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 29 Jun 2001, 14:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 29 Jun 2001, 19:28 GMT
- nurses again, Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 21:19 GMT
- Re: nurses again, Ian Murray Fri 29 Jun 2001, 21:38 GMT
- Foster responds, Doug Henwood Fri 29 Jun 2001, 13:49 GMT
- Re: Foster responds, Louis Proyect Fri 29 Jun 2001, 13:59 GMT