> BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2001: > > RELEASED TODAY: In May 2001, there were 1,426 mass layoff actions by > employers as measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits > during the month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's > Bureau of Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from > a single establishment, and the number of workers involved totaled > 157,759. In January 2001 through May 2001, the total number of events, at > 7,426, and initial claims, at 878,387, were higher than in January-May > 2000 (5,873 and 627,520, respectively). > > New claims for state unemployment insurance fell last week, suggesting > that the rash of layoffs seen so far this year may be moderating. It was > the third straight week that jobless claims made a steep drop. The Labor > Department reported today that the number of Americans filing new > applications for jobless benefits for the workweek ending June 23 declined > by a seasonally adjusted 16,000 to 388,000, the lowest point since early > May. The week before, new claims plunged by 31,000 to 404,000. The more > stable four-week moving average of jobless claims, which smoothes out > week-to-week fluctuations, also fell last week to 416,000, the lowest > level since the beginning of the month (Jeannine Aversa, Associated Press, > http://www.nandotimes.com/business/story/34246p-568833c.html; > http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2001-06-28-jobless.htm). > > The Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a > percentage point today and signaled that its campaign to revive the > flagging economy may be entering its final stage. The rate cut was the > sixth by the central bank since it became clear at the beginning of the > year that the economy was slowing precipitously. But the five previous > reductions were all half a percentage point. In holding to a > quarter-point reduction this time, the Fed suggested that it wanted to > slow the pace of its response to the downturn while it waited to see the > full impact of the steps it had already taken this year (The New York > Times, page A1; The Washington Post, page 1). > > DUE OUT TOMORROW: Employer Costs for Employee Compensation -- March 2001 >
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Lying About Vietnam (and lying about economics), Tom Walker Fri 29 Jun 2001, 15:38 GMT
- Re: Lying About Vietnam (and lying about economics), Michael Pugliese Fri 29 Jun 2001, 15:47 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Lying About Vietnam (and lying about economics), Tom Walker Fri 29 Jun 2001, 16:59 GMT
- STOP!, Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 15:15 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 29 Jun 2001, 14:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 29 Jun 2001, 19:28 GMT
- nurses again, Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 21:19 GMT
- Re: nurses again, Ian Murray Fri 29 Jun 2001, 21:38 GMT
- Foster responds, Doug Henwood Fri 29 Jun 2001, 13:49 GMT