Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
From: "William S. Lear" <rael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:25:21 -0500

On Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 19:41:21 (-0700) Michael Perelman writes:
>Mark, please refrain from telling us what you think Doug thinks.

Especially when it is so far from the mark as to become crude and ugly
pastiche.


Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
  - From: Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
  - From: Mark Jones

Prev by Date: RE: Re: re 180,000 MW new capacity: Update
Next by Date: RE: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
Previous by thread: RE: Re: re 180,000 MW new capacity: Update
Next by thread: RE: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold, (continued)
  - RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Gold, David Shemano Fri 29 Jun 2001, 18:18 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Gold, Jim Devine Fri 29 Jun 2001, 18:52 GMT
  - RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Gold, David Shemano Fri 29 Jun 2001, 18:26 GMT
- Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), William S. Lear Fri 29 Jun 2001, 12:21 GMT
  - RE: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Mark Jones Fri 29 Jun 2001, 12:36 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 15:19 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 14:28 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Ken Hanly Sat 30 Jun 2001, 01:56 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]