PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: A postmodernist reading of Henwood? Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
- To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: A postmodernist reading of Henwood? Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia)
- From: "Mark Jones" <jones118@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:54:30 +0100
Stephen E Philion:
>
> --Isn't context something relevant here? Isn't Henwood engaed in a debate
> with romanticists, deep ecologists, 'small is beautiful' types when he
> makes these arguments,
He was debating Louis Proyect, who is only a romanticist/deep eco by Doug's
own definition. Get real Stephen, you are just wasting our time trying to
salvage what cannot be salvaged. Give it up.
Mark Jones
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), (continued)
- RE: Re: re 180,000 MW new capacity: Update,
Mark Jones Fri 29 Jun 2001, 09:55 GMT
- RE: A postmodernist reading of Henwood? Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia),
Mark Jones Fri 29 Jun 2001, 09:54 GMT
- The benefits of Thatcherism,
Keaney Michael Fri 29 Jun 2001, 08:38 GMT
- Raising school standards,
Keaney Michael Fri 29 Jun 2001, 08:35 GMT
- Capitalist ingenuity,
Keaney Michael Fri 29 Jun 2001, 08:32 GMT
- The future's bright...,
Keaney Michael Fri 29 Jun 2001, 08:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]