PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: Wanniski
Jim Devine writes:
<<No. I'm saying that someone whose economic arguments make no sense is one
who doesn't know much about economics.>>
------------------------
Purely by coincidence, Jack Kemp is on the editorial page of the Wall Street
Journal saying exactly what I am saying regarding the Fed.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3b649a0c7b.htm
This should not be surprising, since Kemp and Wanniski are compadres. Now,
I ask you, since the WSJ editorial page is the semi-official mouthpiece for
capitalism, why would they publish a viewpoint that makes no economic sense
(from the perspective of capitalism)?
David Shemano
- Thread context:
- Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas, (continued)
- Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas,
Doug Henwood Thu 28 Jun 2001, 14:42 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas,
Jim Devine Thu 28 Jun 2001, 16:37 GMT
- Wanniski,
David Shemano Thu 28 Jun 2001, 22:27 GMT
- Re: Wanniski,
Jim Devine Fri 29 Jun 2001, 00:11 GMT
- RE: Re: Wanniski,
David Shemano Fri 29 Jun 2001, 01:13 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Wanniski,
Michael Perelman Fri 29 Jun 2001, 02:44 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Wanniski,
Jim Devine Fri 29 Jun 2001, 02:49 GMT
- Gold,
David Shemano Thu 28 Jun 2001, 22:03 GMT
- Re: Gold,
Michael Perelman Thu 28 Jun 2001, 22:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]