if everywhere you went you noticed that half the people you came in contact with died, wouldn't you feel that maybe you should stop going places? Whether or not the spread of disease was an _active_ measure, it certainly was a _conscious_ one.
right. I doubt that anyone on the European side considered the ethics of this, though I don't think they'd heard of the germ theory of disease. They probably interpreted the native die-off as a sign (once again) that "God is on our side." The Indians probably didn't consider the ethical side, either.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), (continued)
- Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 28 Jun 2001, 19:14 GMT
- Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Louis Proyect Thu 28 Jun 2001, 19:25 GMT
- Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia), Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 28 Jun 2001, 19:42 GMT