Yoshie writes:
I'm simply saying that worrying about what will happen if everyone in the world gets to "to live at current North American ecological standards (say 4.5 ha/person)" under capitalism is _absurd_, since it's _not_ going to happen.
=====
You forget the Veblenian point, however, regarding invidious distinction and status emulation. Regardless of the truth of your assertion, its the consequences of the efforts (however futile) to achieve those standards that are well worth worrying about, especially as these are facilitated and encouraged by the relentless streams of advertising conducted by commercial agencies on behalf of specific products/companies, and politicians on behalf of their corporate paymasters.
Michael K.
Desires unaccompanied by money are not effective demands, however. It seems to me that while overproduction is the dominant tendency of capitalism, shortage may be the most prominent problem under socialism, though Mark insists on worrying about shortage under capitalism.
Yoshie
- Nationwide Strikes in Colombia, Michael Pugliese Thu 28 Jun 2001, 15:34 GMT
- common sense on water??, Michael Perelman Thu 28 Jun 2001, 14:53 GMT
- Re: [marxist] CounterPunch on Hitchens vs. Kissinger, Michael Pugliese Thu 28 Jun 2001, 14:03 GMT
- Cuban Genetic Engineering (was Jesse Lemisch), Keaney Michael Thu 28 Jun 2001, 13:54 GMT
- Re: Cuban Genetic Engineering (was Jesse Lemisch), Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 28 Jun 2001, 14:10 GMT
- Discovery heralds way for plants to survive drought, Mark Jones Thu 28 Jun 2001, 13:46 GMT
- Oil Price Takes Big Hit As Stocks Swell, Mark Jones Thu 28 Jun 2001, 09:43 GMT
- East Timor/United Nations, Keaney Michael Thu 28 Jun 2001, 09:23 GMT
- Re: East Timor/United Nations, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 28 Jun 2001, 11:54 GMT