PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limits
At 23/06/01 22:57 -0500, Matthew wrote:
'reforms' necessary to deal with these limits are so severe it is hard
to see how it would still be 'capitalism' once we're done. on the other
hand, it's still here. what about political? social?
Indeed the reforms will ultimately change the character of capital as capital.
Incremental reforms are not wrong, and may be useful if they increase
confidence in the democratic movement. The important thing is a clear
consciousness of the goal and an ability to sustain and coordinate pressure
over several decades, and the world as a whole. We have the technology and
the consciousness to do that.
Chris Burford
London
- Thread context:
- Fungus,
Ian Murray Sun 24 Jun 2001, 18:48 GMT
- [exyualista] Fw (en) Autonomia and the Origin of the Black Bloc,
Michael Pugliese Sun 24 Jun 2001, 17:32 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits,
Forstater, Mathew Sun 24 Jun 2001, 04:01 GMT
- Hey, sorry but I'm on a Lamy binge :-),
Ian Murray Sun 24 Jun 2001, 03:18 GMT
- Pascal Lamy live on WebTV/Audio,
Ian Murray Sun 24 Jun 2001, 03:09 GMT
- RE: In Latin Economies, a Sinking Feeling,
Ian Murray Sun 24 Jun 2001, 03:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]