Jim Devine wrote:
BTW, what does the petrogeological profession as a whole think of Hubbert? what is the professional consensus on his methods and conclusions? why should we believe him rather than others? or is he "reputable" the way Milton Friedman is?
When Mark started going on about the disappearance of oil a few years ago, I called around to a bunch of industry savants, and had several on the radio. Mark's opnion is definitely a minority one - which doesn't make it wrong, of course. But he doesn't often acknowledge this. A guy from the Petroleum Finance Corp. agreed with me when I suggested the real danger was that we'd choke ourselves if we burned all the oil we have, rather than it running out disastrously soon.
Doug
- capitalism's expansion vs. limits, (continued)
- capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Jim Devine Sat 23 Jun 2001, 01:21 GMT
- Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Michael Perelman Sat 23 Jun 2001, 01:57 GMT
- RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Mark Jones Sat 23 Jun 2001, 07:46 GMT
- Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Jim Devine Sat 23 Jun 2001, 18:12 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Doug Henwood Sat 23 Jun 2001, 18:36 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Michael Perelman Sat 23 Jun 2001, 18:50 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Louis Proyect Sat 23 Jun 2001, 19:02 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Jim Devine Sat 23 Jun 2001, 19:43 GMT
- Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limits, Patrick Bond Sat 23 Jun 2001, 08:27 GMT