Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: red flags

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: red flags
From: Eugene Coyle <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:40:13 -0700

War of the Roses again?

    I'm betting on York.

Gene Coyle

Margaret Coleman wrote:

> Bread and Roses?? maggie
>
> Jim Devine wrote:
>
> > checking out the British Labour Party on the web, they seem to have dropped
> > the red flag as their symbol (replacing it with a red rose -- with thorns?)
> > but not the red flag anthem.
> >
> > Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: red flags
  - From: Margaret Coleman

Prev by Date: Global Judgement Treaty- Corporate Power Enforcement
Next by Date: Re: Current implications for South Africa
Previous by thread: Global Judgement Treaty- Corporate Power Enforcement
Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: red flags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: Current implications for South Africa, (continued)
  - Current implications for South Africa, Charles Brown Tue 26 Jun 2001, 14:14 GMT
    - Re: Current implications for South Africa, Michael Pugliese Tue 26 Jun 2001, 18:30 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: red flags, Eugene Coyle Fri 22 Jun 2001, 14:43 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: red flags, Margaret Coleman Sat 23 Jun 2001, 00:36 GMT
    - Re: red flags, Carrol Cox Sat 23 Jun 2001, 02:33 GMT
      
      Re: red flags, Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 23 Jun 2001, 04:10 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - red flags, Keaney Michael Tue 26 Jun 2001, 07:57 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]