PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Current implications for South Africa
To extract from Patrick Bond's long post of 20th June:
One work from the left ANC tradition (which
I had the privilege to edit), Mzwanele Mayekiso's
Township Politics: Civic Struggles for a New
South Africa (New York, Monthly Review, 1996),
makes a plausible case that many more insurgent
moments and a deeper transformation were
feasible, still within the scope of the ANC/SACP
National Democratic Revolution.
To what extent is there still relevance in the ANC/SACP concept of the
National Democratic Revolution?
Is there indeed scope for radical democratic initiatives that take the
National Democratic Revolution forward and have a socialist content or
prepare the ground for socialism?
Briefly, if we seek to understand why the
condition for political reform was not capitalist
growth, but rather stagnation (and hence the need
for capitalists to explore a new export-oriented
route to accumulation), a classical Marxist
approach to cycles of capital accumulation may be
more helpful. Cycles of accumulation are the
waves of investment and growth which are
invariably followed by periods of excess capacity
and stagnation, often referred to as
"overaccumulation crisis." (South Africa
experienced such cycles throughout its modern
history, and has suffered persistent, worsening
symptoms of overaccumulation since the late
1960s.)
Under such conditions, crisis displacement
occurs to a large degree through intensified
uneven development. This is because
overaccumulated capital in its most liquid form,
finance, flows easily across space in search of
more profitable outlets. The advent of
overaccumulation crisis across the world in the
early 1970s was, not uncoincidentally, the same
point at which the Bretton Woods institutions (the
World Bank and IMF) assumed added global
economic management power. Conditions of
uneven development already underway between
different regions of the world economy rapidly
sharpened under the dominance of neo-liberal
policy, in a process not restricted to any particular
national balance of forces. Instead, there is a
deeper underlying meaning. In his authoritative
study of the topic, Neil Smith concludes that
while uneven development dates to the time of
"primitive accumulation and the opposition of
capital against pre-capitalist societies," modern-
day global capitalism retains a "dichotomous
form. But today it is less an issue of the
`articulation of different modes of production,'
more an issue of development at one pole and
development of underdevelopment at the other"
(Smith, 1990, Uneven Development, Oxford, Basil
Blackwell).
While we keep our eyes on the perpetually
evolving form of crisis-ridden capitalism in South
Africa, particularly the very slight modification to
its racial configurations, the lesson I learn from
these prefacatory surveys of Marxist political-
economic studies is that neo-Marxian fads come
and go, but that it is from more durable and
universal critiques of the accumulation process,
especially uneven development, that we must
continue to learn from, and contribute to.
If uneven development on a world scale and within a country like South
Africa, runs into crises of accumulation and if these tendencies have
intensified with the international dominance of neo-liberalism, does it not
suggest that there is a democratic agenda at a global level as well as at
the level of individual countries?
Critical though South African radicals may be about how former
anti-apartheid leaders have been bought off, this is also a reflection of
the material reality of the balance of forces and the shift of the struggle
to one of revolutionary reforms versus reformist reforms.
What reforms are most relevant now for South Africa, domestically, *and*
internationally?
Or should left wingers just rally under the abstract red flag of socialism,
and hope others will join them?
Chris Burford
London
- Thread context:
- Grundrisse and combined and uneven development,
Chris Burford Fri 22 Jun 2001, 05:38 GMT
- Current implications for South Africa,
Chris Burford Fri 22 Jun 2001, 05:37 GMT
- Re: not yet unsubscribed,
Lastmanthere Fri 22 Jun 2001, 05:07 GMT
- unsubscribe,
Issam Mansour Fri 22 Jun 2001, 02:59 GMT
- The Fed and the Dollar,
David Shemano Fri 22 Jun 2001, 02:04 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]