RE: relevance

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: relevance
From: "Max Sawicky" <sawicky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:56:52 -0400

Does this endless debate over the origins of capitalism have any
relevance to contemporary politics? I don't think it has to - I'm not
demanding relevance as a precondition for debate. Just curious about
the volume and vehemence of it all.  Doug

no, but the concept of hydraulic lock-in
deserves more attention.

mbs

References:
- relevance
  - From: Doug Henwood

Prev by Date: RE: Re: S. Africa/mode of prod. debate
Next by Date: Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas
Previous by thread: Re: relevance
Next by thread: RE: relevance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: pen-l etiquette, (continued)
  - Re: pen-l etiquette, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:09 GMT
- Communique from the Pagainas Piqueteras del Norte de Salta (Argentina), Michael Pugliese Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:53 GMT
- relevance, Doug Henwood Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:10 GMT
  - Re: relevance, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:18 GMT
  - RE: relevance, Max Sawicky Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:44 GMT
  - RE: relevance, Mark Jones Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:36 GMT
    - Re: RE: relevance, Louis Proyect Thu 21 Jun 2001, 18:40 GMT
    - Re: RE: relevance, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 18:57 GMT
      
      RE: Re: RE: relevance, Mark Jones Thu 21 Jun 2001, 19:33 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]