Re: relevance

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: relevance
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:15:09 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

Excellent question.  That is why I asked on how we have moved beyond the
old mode of production debates.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:06:53PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Does this endless debate over the origins of capitalism have any
> relevance to contemporary politics? I don't think it has to - I'm not
> demanding relevance as a precondition for debate. Just curious about
> the volume and vehemence of it all.
>
> Doug
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- relevance
  - From: Doug Henwood

Prev by Date: red flags & reformism
Next by Date: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas
Previous by thread: relevance
Next by thread: RE: relevance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: pen-l etiquette, (continued)
  - Re: Re: Re: pen-l etiquette, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:06 GMT
  - Re: pen-l etiquette, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:09 GMT
- Communique from the Pagainas Piqueteras del Norte de Salta (Argentina), Michael Pugliese Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:53 GMT
- relevance, Doug Henwood Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:10 GMT
  - Re: relevance, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:18 GMT
  - RE: relevance, Max Sawicky Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:44 GMT
  - RE: relevance, Mark Jones Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:36 GMT
    - Re: RE: relevance, Louis Proyect Thu 21 Jun 2001, 18:40 GMT
    - Re: RE: relevance, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 18:57 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]