relevance

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: relevance
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:06:53 -0400

Does this endless debate over the origins of capitalism have any
relevance to contemporary politics? I don't think it has to - I'm not
demanding relevance as a precondition for debate. Just curious about
the volume and vehemence of it all.

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- RE: relevance
  - From: Mark Jones
- RE: relevance
  - From: Max Sawicky
- Re: relevance
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas
Next by Date: Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas
Previous by thread: There's just not enough space 4 everyone
Next by thread: Re: relevance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: pen-l etiquette, Jim Devine Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:02 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: pen-l etiquette, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:06 GMT
  - Re: pen-l etiquette, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:09 GMT
- Communique from the Pagainas Piqueteras del Norte de Salta (Argentina), Michael Pugliese Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:53 GMT
- relevance, Doug Henwood Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:10 GMT
  - Re: relevance, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:18 GMT
  - RE: relevance, Max Sawicky Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:44 GMT
  - RE: relevance, Mark Jones Thu 21 Jun 2001, 17:36 GMT
    - Re: RE: relevance, Louis Proyect Thu 21 Jun 2001, 18:40 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]