You said it Justin:Primarily the social relations of production, i.e., the class relations whose structure ****primarily explains the nature and development of the mode of production, the state, and, less directly, ideology.**** This is elementary. Surely you knew this is the historical materialist view? L&M attack it (wrongly) as monocausal, narrowminded class reductionsim and bad essentialism. --jks
It is essentialist. Relations of production DO NOT, in all case, in all historical epochs, explain the nature of the state. War has been in many instances far more important.
What explains the cause of war, though? War itself? Human nature? Something else?
Yoshie
- Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, (continued)
- Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Michael Perelman Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:10 GMT
- Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:13 GMT
- Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Justin Schwartz Thu 21 Jun 2001, 15:01 GMT
- Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Ricardo Duchesne Thu 21 Jun 2001, 15:54 GMT
- Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:06 GMT
- Re: Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Jim Devine Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:38 GMT
- Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Ricardo Duchesne Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Justin Schwartz Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:15 GMT
- Foucault, Marx, Poulantzas, Ricardo Duchesne Thu 21 Jun 2001, 16:24 GMT