PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

Re: No agrarian revo?

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: No agrarian revo?
From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:54:55 -0500

Ricardo Duchesne wrote:
>
> > that knowledge
> is possible only through dogmatic closure.

Classically, this has long been known by the name of "poisoning the
wells of discourse." I never argue with people who explain my beliefs in
terms of my private psychology rather than in terms of the arguments I
express.

Carrol

References:
- No agrarian revo?
  - From: Mark Jones
- No agrarian revo?
  - From: Ricardo Duchesne

Prev by Date: "Hydraulic lock-in"
Next by Date: Korean strikes backlash
Previous by thread: Re: Dependency theory
Next by thread: RE: No agrarian revo?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- No agrarian revo?, (continued)
  - RE: No agrarian revo?, Mark Jones Sat 16 Jun 2001, 18:45 GMT
    - Progress (was No agrarian revo?), Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 16 Jun 2001, 19:55 GMT
      
      RE: Progress (was No agrarian revo?), Mark Jones Sat 16 Jun 2001, 20:39 GMT
      
      Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?), Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Jun 2001, 05:45 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]