Jim Devine: > yeah, but B & W built on M's theory. If it were so, one would concede it, but it ain't so. What B&W do is stand M on his head, IMHO. Mark Jones
- Re: No agrarian revo?, (continued)
- Re: No agrarian revo?, Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 15 Jun 2001, 20:35 GMT
- Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Jim Devine Fri 15 Jun 2001, 20:42 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Louis Proyect Fri 15 Jun 2001, 20:48 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Jim Devine Fri 15 Jun 2001, 21:59 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Mark Jones Fri 15 Jun 2001, 22:40 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Jim Devine Fri 15 Jun 2001, 23:31 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Mark Jones Fri 15 Jun 2001, 23:47 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Michael Perelman Fri 15 Jun 2001, 23:55 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, Carrol Cox Sat 16 Jun 2001, 00:50 GMT