PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: No agrarian revo?
Nicely put.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:56:35PM -0400, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> Looking at the entire world, not
> just the English countryside, strengthens the theory, rather than
> disproving it.
>
> For Marxism, theoretical errors are graver than factual errors. The
> latter is easier to grasp & correct than the former.
>
> Yoshie
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: No agrarian revo?, (continued)
- RE: Re: No agrarian revo?,
Mark Jones Fri 15 Jun 2001, 21:19 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: No agrarian revo?,
Michael Perelman Fri 15 Jun 2001, 21:37 GMT
- Re: No agrarian revo?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 15 Jun 2001, 22:02 GMT
- Re: Re: No agrarian revo?,
Michael Perelman Fri 15 Jun 2001, 22:15 GMT
- RE: Re: No agrarian revo?,
Mark Jones Fri 15 Jun 2001, 22:55 GMT
- Re: agrarian revo?,
Michael Perelman Fri 15 Jun 2001, 23:19 GMT
- Wierd,
Michael Perelman Fri 15 Jun 2001, 23:41 GMT
- Re: Wierd,
Carrol Cox Sat 16 Jun 2001, 02:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]