PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: the mita
Mercantilism = Code of Hammurabi = Kelly Girls? Maybe Andre G. Frank is
right about 5,000 year waves...
>The stela at Susa records +/- 282 of H's legal decisions, and many of 'em are
>to do with rules for commerce (on price setting for services, differential
>tariffs and the nature of rights and obligations between landowners and the
>workers of the land). Rules that do the sort of thing M&E write about in the
>Manifesto insofar as an attempt is made to supplant lots of traditional
>relations and their concomitant rights (although the penalty schedule does
>evince a traditional power differential). I'm of the impression that much of
>what we might call 'mercantilism' was in place - the code was meant to
>standardise trade practices across lines isomorphic to national boundaries,
>and the class of merchants was a politically powerful class, with strong
>linkages to a 'state' which recognised their role, privileged it, and
>carefully regulated it.
>
>Cheers,
>Rob.
>
Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org/
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: the mita, (continued)
- Re: Re: the mita,
Louis Proyect Fri 25 May 2001, 20:33 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: the mita,
Jim Devine Mon 28 May 2001, 02:48 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita,
Louis Proyect Mon 28 May 2001, 13:03 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita,
Rob Schaap Mon 28 May 2001, 22:54 GMT
- Re: Re: the mita,
Louis Proyect Mon 28 May 2001, 23:45 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: the mita,
Stephen E Philion Tue 29 May 2001, 02:28 GMT
- Re: the mita,
Michael Perelman Tue 29 May 2001, 02:47 GMT
- Re: Re: the mita,
Louis Proyect Tue 29 May 2001, 02:59 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: the mita,
Stephen E Philion Tue 29 May 2001, 03:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]