Re: Reply to Brenner/Wood, part 2

[Anthony DCosta <dcosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Two excellent syntheses of these authors (in English) written by Latin
Americans (based in the UK) are "Latin American Theories of Development
and Underdevelopment" (Cristobal Kay, 1989, Routledge) and "Theories of
Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency (Jorge Larrain, 1989,
Polity).  I have used both, I really liked Larrain and many of the things
Lou brings up can be found in it.

Cheers, Anthony
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa
Associate Professor				Ph: (253) 692-4462
Comparative International Development		Fax: (253) 692-5718		
University of Washington			Box Number: 358436
1900 Commerce Street				
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 25 May 2001, Ricardo Duchesne wrote:

> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:32:40 -0300
> From: Ricardo Duchesne <rduchesn@xxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PEN-L:12197] Reply to Brenner/Wood, part 2
>
>
>
> <color><param>7F00,0000,0000</param>>Did Wood and Brenner plagiarize from Laclau? do you have evidence to
>
> >back up this accusation?
>
>
> </color>It is not so much that he plagiarize as that he has said nothing that
> had not been said before re importance of  class relations.
> Besides, Brenner and Wood have zero knowledge of Latin
> America. If you want sophisticated studies of Latin American
> development from both a dependency and a class perspective
> consult Dos Santos, Gabriel Palma, Osvaldo Sunkel, Raul Prebish,
> Rodolfo Stavengen, Ernesto Cardoso, Celso Furtado, Enzo Faletto,
> and Ruy Mauro Marini.
>
>
> Better a ECLA Latin American than a UCLA Californian.
>
> <nofill>
>
>