Michael Keaney wrote:I think O'Connor's analysis is central to an understanding of the present plethora of "public-private partnerships" infesting the UK as part of New Labour's conversion to the natural party of government.
am I the only one who found O'Connor's FISCAL CRISIS to be a bit incoherent?
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
Could you elaborate on the above?
not really, since it's hard to summarize a feeling that different parts of the same book don't fit together well. I think someone who knows public finance better would do a better job. BTW, I did find that the book made some important useful points. But then I was disappointed that it didn't quite gel.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
- Re: reply to J. Donald Hughes, (continued)
- Re: reply to J. Donald Hughes, Michael Pugliese Fri 25 May 2001, 14:51 GMT
- Fiscal Crisis of the State, Keaney Michael Fri 25 May 2001, 14:12 GMT
- Re: Fiscal Crisis of the State, Jim Devine Fri 25 May 2001, 15:20 GMT
- Re: Fiscal Crisis of the State, Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 25 May 2001, 15:26 GMT
- Re: Re: Fiscal Crisis of the State, Jim Devine Fri 25 May 2001, 15:46 GMT
- IMF, Keaney Michael Fri 25 May 2001, 13:34 GMT
- RE: IMF, Mark Jones Fri 25 May 2001, 19:36 GMT
- RE: RE: IMF, Mark Jones Sat 26 May 2001, 08:26 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- IMF, Keaney Michael Mon 28 May 2001, 13:57 GMT