PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again
Max Sawicky wrote:
Seems to me Doug's question is what is the
effect of the extra X on the growth rate.
No, I'm not that vulgar, claims to the contrary. I was looking for
some kind of qualitative and quantitative account of the contribution
of imperialism to the maintenance of First World wealth. Is it
something that's constantly renewed every day, or is it mainly the
inheritance from an earlier colonialism? I got flamed for saying this
once, but the poorest countries in the world are poor mainly because
they're excluded from value production, not because they get the
short end of it. What do the 1.2 billion people who live on $1/day
contribute to our $25,000 per capita DPIs?
Doug
- Thread context:
- Re: Eurocentrism once again, (continued)
- RE: Eurocentrism once again,
Max Sawicky Thu 24 May 2001, 14:41 GMT
- Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again,
Doug Henwood Thu 24 May 2001, 17:13 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again,
Anthony DCosta Thu 24 May 2001, 20:08 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again,
Brad DeLong Fri 25 May 2001, 17:18 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again,
Anthony DCosta Fri 25 May 2001, 17:26 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again,
Michael Perelman Fri 25 May 2001, 18:56 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]