RE: Re: technology as a reason for hope?

To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re: technology as a reason for hope?
From: "Brown, Martin (NCI)" <mbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:35:01 -0400

Back to IBM days!

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Perelman [mailto:michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:34 PM
To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [PEN-L:11938] Re: technology as a reason for hope?

As I understand Microsoft's plans, it does not intend to have corporate
users
upgrade.  Following Jeremy Rifkin, they plan to have corporations LEASE
their
programs for a limited period.  It would then be illegal NOT to upgrade.

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: technology as a reason for hope?
Next by Date: [Fwd: ZNet Update / Pacifica Protest]
Previous by thread: Re: RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope?
Next by thread: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: technology as a reason for hope?, (continued)
  - RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope?, Brown, Martin (NCI) Tue 22 May 2001, 17:29 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope?, ravi narayan Tue 22 May 2001, 17:46 GMT
  - RE: Re: technology as a reason for hope?, Brown, Martin (NCI) Tue 22 May 2001, 18:36 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: IMF as the "world Fed"?, Chris Burford Tue 22 May 2001, 06:32 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: Re: IMF as the "world Fed"?, Jim Devine Tue 22 May 2001, 14:48 GMT
    - Re: IMF as the "world Fed"?, Chris Burford Sat 26 May 2001, 08:57 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: Re: IMF as the "world Fed"?, Brad DeLong Thu 24 May 2001, 13:15 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]