PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

Re: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101
From: Brad DeLong <delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:43:01 -0700

Max Sawicky wrote:

Any change
in wealth IS income.


By what definition? Certainly not the NIPA definition.

Doug


Henry Simons's definition...

Brad DeLong

References:
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101
  - From: Doug Henwood

Prev by Date: Re: Vaporware
Next by Date: Re: RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope?
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Origination of Capitalism
Next by thread: Re: Re: Keynesian economics 101
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: Origination of Capitalism, (continued)
  - Re: Re: Keynesian economics 101, christian11 Tue 22 May 2001, 15:09 GMT
- RE: technology as a reason for hope?, Brown, Martin (NCI) Tue 22 May 2001, 13:49 GMT
  - Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope?, ravi narayan Tue 22 May 2001, 17:12 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope?, Jim Devine Tue 22 May 2001, 16:13 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]