In fact, most studies show that the vast block of white well-paid blue collor unionists, what was dubbed the "labor aristocracy" by Maoists and others in the late 60s and early 70s, have been the ones who have suffered the largest relative decline in wages and standard of living in the last twenty-five years. A vestigal group through seniority have held on at a few outposts like the Big Three automakers, but they are a tiny fraction of the vast number who saw their wages collapse under them.
this fits with my prejudice: I've thought for a long time that though some "elite" blue collar workers gained from imperialism in the short run (since it allowed employers to make concessions and governments to allow stable welfare states), they lose in the long run (due to capital mobility, the race to the bottom, etc.)
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: the Kaiser, (continued)
- Re: Re: the Kaiser, Carrol Cox Wed 28 Mar 2001, 17:41 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: the Kaiser, Louis Proyect Wed 28 Mar 2001, 18:04 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: the Kaiser, Nathan Newman Wed 28 Mar 2001, 20:44 GMT
- Re: Re: the Kaiser, Louis Proyect Wed 28 Mar 2001, 20:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the Kaiser, Jim Devine Wed 28 Mar 2001, 22:24 GMT
- iht.com article | More on Call Centers in India, dcosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed 28 Mar 2001, 14:35 GMT
- Facts about electricity consumption, Louis Proyect Wed 28 Mar 2001, 14:06 GMT
- [Fwd: Student Protests Against Horowitz Ad], Carrol Cox Wed 28 Mar 2001, 13:04 GMT
- War on the War on Drugs, Keaney Michael Wed 28 Mar 2001, 12:20 GMT