Michael Perelman wrote:
Debating who is and is not sectarian is absolutely unproductive. I would like to hear more about the 1982 downturn compared to today. Remember how Volcker was able to turn it around by merely loosening the monetary spigot. Will Greenspan's rate cuts cause a turnaround in six months.
How is speculation on that any more productive than debating sectarianism? There is no one on earth who knows the answer to that question.
Doug
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), (continued)
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), Doug Henwood Tue 27 Mar 2001, 01:08 GMT
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), Nathan Newman Tue 27 Mar 2001, 01:34 GMT
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), Michael Perelman Tue 27 Mar 2001, 01:40 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), Ian Murray Mon 26 Mar 2001, 23:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), Doug Henwood Mon 26 Mar 2001, 22:45 GMT
- Re: ocialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), Michael Perelman Mon 26 Mar 2001, 23:06 GMT