PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building"
Louis Proyect wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately, this sounds to me like economism of the "What is to be Done"
> variety.
>
Not clear. Are you saying the book itself was economist?
Carrol
- Thread context:
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.), (continued)
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.),
Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 26 Mar 2001, 14:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.),
Louis Proyect Mon 26 Mar 2001, 15:16 GMT
- "nonsectarian party-building",
Jim Devine Mon 26 Mar 2001, 16:20 GMT
- Re: "nonsectarian party-building",
Louis Proyect Mon 26 Mar 2001, 16:24 GMT
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building",
Carrol Cox Mon 26 Mar 2001, 18:32 GMT
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building",
Jim Devine Mon 26 Mar 2001, 22:56 GMT
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.),
Nathan Newman Mon 26 Mar 2001, 16:27 GMT
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.),
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Mon 26 Mar 2001, 20:05 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.),
Doug Henwood Mon 26 Mar 2001, 20:13 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]