PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
NASDAQ Question
>>> jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 03/22/01 10:56AM >>>
Tom wrote:
>No. Assuming the calculation is right, the $4.7 trillion would represent a
>value that could never be realized because if investors tried to liquidate
>their portfolios, prices would come down and they would "lose" the $4.7
>trillion that they never had in the first place. Likewise, if everyone on
>pen-l promised to given everyone else a million bucks, we'd all be
>fabulously rich until we tried to spend it. The astonishing thing is not
>the "wipe out" but the illusion that there was anything there to be wiped
>out.
the problem arises to the extent that the $4.7 trillion was perceived as
real and used as collateral for loans, etc.
((((((((((
CB: Was it counted in GDP ?
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Underconsumption, (continued)
- Rules for Work,
Charles Brown Thu 22 Mar 2001, 16:46 GMT
- Re: Re: NASDAQ Question,
Jim Devine Thu 22 Mar 2001, 16:38 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- NASDAQ Question,
Charles Brown Thu 22 Mar 2001, 16:47 GMT
- Hence the crises,
Charles Brown Thu 22 Mar 2001, 16:10 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Japan,
Brad DeLong Thu 22 Mar 2001, 14:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]